Striving Artist
Koonsâs job at MoMA gave him the opportunity to immerse himself in the history of modernism, in particular the ideas of Marcel Duchamp, who changed art history by showing how everyday objects, or âreadymades,â could be elevated into the realm of art, depending on context. Duchampâs theories were a revelation to Koons. While at MoMA he started to fool around with a bunch of cheap inflatables, blowups of flowers and bunnies, riffing on Duchampâs idea of readymades and propping them against mirrors in his apartment. âThe sexual power of the imagery was so intoxicating to me visually that I had to have a drink,â he remembers. âI went to Slugger Annâs, Jackie Curtisâs grandmotherâs bar.â
The reference to Curtis ties Koons to the last true avant-gardeâ"a pedigree the artist likes. Curtis, who refused to be called a drag queen, was a pioneer of the L.G.B.T. movement and, like Candy Darling, was made famous by Warhol. Koons clearly relishes the fact that he and Warhol are often discussed in the same breath these days, but in fact, as artists and personalities, they couldnât be more different. Warhol had a double whammy of an outsider perspective: the American son of Slovak immigrants, he was gay at a time when it was a very different proposition from what it is today. Koons, on the other hand, grew up in the embrace of community, with a secure sense of belonging. Warhol liked to have young folks around him at the Factory, but he didnât want to actually spawn any. Koons has enough kids of his own (eight) to start a touring company of The Sound of Music. Warhol was almost Zen in his grasp of the light touch in making his artworks and getting them out into the world. Koons goes through a ring of fire for each work, so much so that his finished output is actually quite slim. âWe average 6.75 paintings and 15 to 20 sculptures a year,â he told me. (He i s always very exact.) Warhol was practically monosyllabic with art critics, dealers, and collectors. Koons is the opposite.
Actually, if there is anyone the artist seems to be inspired by at this point in his life, it is Picasso, whom Koons refers to a lot. Koons, at 59, has already begun a strict exercise-and-diet regimen so that he will have a shot at working undiminished into his 80s, as Picasso did. He hits his upstairs gym every day at around noon when he is in the studio, then eats a lean lunch. For the rest of the afternoon he dips into an assortment of nuts, cereals, fresh vegetables, and Zone bars. Once in a while heâll apologize for an odor if heâs eating broccoli.
What Warhol and Koons do have in common, though, is an uncanny ability to nail an image or an object so that it catches the Zeitgeist. The first time Koons landed on such an idea was in 1979, around the time he left MoMA. He had been experimenting with kitchen appliances, such as toasters, refrigerators, and deep fryers, attaching them to fluorescent-light tubes. These gave way to the artistâs first fully realized series, âThe New,â which included never used vacuum cleaners and rug shampooers, often presented in clear Plexiglas vitrines and illuminated by fluorescent lights. âI thought of them as eternal-virgin-type situations,â says Koons.
By then he was selling mutual funds to get by. The artworks got some buzz in the downtown art community, and for a minute Koons was taken on by the dealer of the moment, Mary Boone. As he whispered to trusted fellow artists, he was excited to become a âBooney,â but it didnât work out in the end. Another dealer returned a vacuum-cleaner piece. Broke and heartbroken, Koons called a time-out and spent six months or so with his parents, who had moved to Florida, where he saved money from a job as a political canvasser.
What came next, upon his return to New York, was the game changer: his âEquilibriumâ series. He was working once again in the high-pressure world of finance, this time trading commodities, but by night he was cooking up what would turn out to be his first coup. Involving a dark, Nietzschean worldview, it was almost the opposite of the cheerful Koonsian iconography people have grown accustomed to. Take two works from 1985: a cast-bronze scuba apparatus, which he called Aqualung, and a bronze Lifeboat. Itâs immediately obvious they arenât going to save anyone. Instead theyâll take you down.
The âEquilibriumâ works were exhibited in 1985 in Koonsâs first solo show, at International with Monument, a short-lived, artist-run gallery in the East Village. Dakis Joannou, a Greek collector, who would become an important champion of the artistâs, was stunned when he saw the show. âI was so intrigued with the basketball piece, One Ball Total Equilibrium Tank,â he remembers. âI wa nted to buy that piece.â The now iconic works of single or multiple basketballs in fishtanks had taken countless experiments and many phone calls to scientists, including Nobel Prize winner Dr. Richard P. Feynman, who encouraged Koons to work out the right proportion of distilled and saline water so that the basketballs would neither rise nor sink. Joannou asked to meet the artist. âHe was serious,â says Joannou. âHe had depth. He had vision. He had an enormous world of his own that he had not even started exploring yet.â (Joannou scooped up the work for $2,700.)
The Whitney exhibition will have prime examples from the Koons hit parade, from his earliest works to his most recent, including stainless-steel objects from both the âLuxury and Degradationâ series (a Travel Bar, the Jim Beam-J.B. Turner Train, etc.) and the âStatuaryâ series, which featured Koonsâs most critically admired work, Rabbit, 1986. This mirror-polished, eni gmatic, silver stainless-steel bunny is the piece that won over previously unconvinced curators, art historians, and critics, who saw it as a dazzling contemporary update of a broad range of iconography, from Playboy bunnies to Brancusiâs soaring forms.
But Koons aspires to appeal not just to the cognoscenti. Nowhere was this more obvious than in his âBanalityâ series, created mostly in traditional porcelain and wood in workshops in Italy and Germany in the late 80s. The works are a virtual populist paradise that runs the gamut from St. John the Baptist to an all-gold-and-white Michael Jackson, cradling his pet monkey. The springboard for the work was found common objects and popular souvenirs, to which Koons then brought his art wand. Plenty of people checked out these artworks at the Sonnabend Gallery, where the artist had finally found a home. Soon there would be even more signs that he might one day reach his goal, which he once described rather immodestly a s wanting to create the art equivalent of what the Beatles had done.
Heaven Couldnât Wait
Koons always captures the Zeitgeist, for better or for worse, so there is a perfect logic to the âMade in Heavenâ series, which he exhibited at Sonnabend in the fall of 1991, a period in which sex went from under the counter to center stage because of AIDS. What Koons did was the heterosexual equivalent of Robert Mapplethorpeâs taboo-busting images of men having sex togetherâ"in fact, Koonsâs paintings and sculptures, created out of wood, marble, glass, and canvases photomechanically printed with oil inks, include some of the most graphic sexual imagery ever produced in Western art that went public. Itâs impossible to imagine this work without its leading lady, Ilona Staller, better known as La Cicciolina (translated as the âlittle dumplingâ), an only-in-Italy personage, whom Koons met after he saw her picture in a mag azine as a model. Almost immediately they got up close and personal. The Hungarian-born Stallerâ"a former porn star/erotic-video icon/politicianâ"has so far been Koonsâs only human readymade, and, being human, she had issues.
The paintings Koons created of the two of them feature penetration, both anal and vaginal, and liberal amounts of semen. Discussing one of the most no-holes-barred pictures, Koons says, âWhat I really like about it are the pimples on Ilonaâs ass. The confidence to reveal oneâs ass like that. Thatâs like my reference to Courbetâs The Origin of the World.â And heâs not kidding.
For a while their life imitated art, and vice versa. The couple fell in love and, after a wedding in Budapest and about a year in Munich, where Koons oversaw production of his âMade in Heavenâ project, they came back to New York. âMy dad said that he thought it was crazy, but he was very accepting,â recalls Koons. Dad wasnât the only one who thought it was loony.
No comments:
Post a Comment